Page 25 - ENAV eng_Relazione_Finanziaria_Annuale_2014

Report on Operations 23

Capacity En-route - targets vs Actual Performance 2014

IFR/GAT Flights En-route Service Unit En-route ATFCM
Delay Cost/Min
1,556,193 8,313,546
87.00
Performance Plan Target Target reached

En-route ATFCM 0.12 0.02
Delay per Flight 186,743
16,246,641 31,124
En-route ATFCM
Minutes of Delay (Min) 2,707,788

En-route ATFCM
Delay Cost (Euro)

It is important to emphasize that ENAV’s performance is very positive
precisely because it is related to increased air traffic volumes assisted in
the summer, in that ATFCM delays are normally generated at times of
high demand. Keeping in mind that air traffic also increased at daily peaks
compared to 2013, it is clear that this excellent performance depends on
the organizational capacity that the Company has successfully maintained
over time.

In short, with reference to the data shared with the Performance Review
Body and with the Network Manager, bodies appointed by the European
Commission, the comparison of performance indicators of major European
ANSP confirms the value of operational performance, KPI En-route ATFCM
Delay per En-route Flights as well as the related economic countervalue
generated by ENAV for Airspace Users, Additional ATFCM Delay Cost.

International activities

In Europe, ENAV is committed at all levels and in numerous institutional
and industrial contexts to ensure consistent and effective development of
the ATM sector in order to achieve Single European Sky objectives. Single
European Sky (SES) rules were modified in 2014 by means of the so-
called SES+2 legislative package discussed and approved by the European
Parliament. Italy, which held the presidency of the Council of the European
Union in the second half of the year, played a key role in this process, to
which ENAV provided constant support for all activities conducted in the
period. The text of the general approach for the legislative package was
approved by the meeting of Transport Ministers on 3 December 2014
and was a clear success for Italy, recognized by the European States and
institutions for its merit and method, as it resolved the principal critical
points included in the European Commission’s initial text and also
obtained the support of countries that had initially been most critical of
the Commission’s initiative.